<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
		<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>Iranian Journal of Catalysis (IJC)</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Comparative study on the electrocatalytic activity of dissimilar electrode combinations for the treatment of textile effluent by electrocoagulation process and their subsequent reuse</JournalTitle>
			<Issn></Issn>
			<Volume>Volume 13 (2023) IJC</Volume>
			<Issue>Issue 3, September 2023</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
                <Year>2023</Year>
                <Month>11</Month>
                <Day>17</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<ArticleTitle>Comparative study on the electrocatalytic activity of dissimilar electrode combinations for the treatment of textile effluent by electrocoagulation process and their subsequent reuse</ArticleTitle>
		<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
		<FirstPage></FirstPage>
		<LastPage></LastPage>
		<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30495/ijc.2023.1991117.2022</ELocationID>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
            			<Author>
                				<FirstName>Jovitha</FirstName>
				<LastName>Jane David</LastName>
				<Affiliation>Department of Physical Sciences, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore-641114, Tamil Nadu, India.</Affiliation>
				<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1295-447X</Identifier>
			</Author>
            			<Author>
                				<FirstName>Asath</FirstName>
				<LastName>Stephen Murphy Maria</LastName>
				<Affiliation>Department of Physical Sciences, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore-641114, Tamil Nadu, India.</Affiliation>
				<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-5091-938X</Identifier>
			</Author>
            			<Author>
                				<FirstName>Riju</FirstName>
				<LastName>Suguna Robin</LastName>
				<Affiliation>Department of Physical Sciences, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore-641114, Tamil Nadu, India.</Affiliation>
				<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0009-3838-1113</Identifier>
			</Author>
            			<Author>
                				<FirstName>Sahaya</FirstName>
				<LastName>Leenus Sebastian</LastName>
				<Affiliation>Department of Physical Sciences, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore-641114, Tamil Nadu, India.</Affiliation>
				<Identifier Source="ORCID"></Identifier>
			</Author>
            			<Author>
                				<FirstName>Jegathambal</FirstName>
				<LastName>Palanichamy</LastName>
				<Affiliation>Water Institute, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore-641114, Tamil Nadu, India.</Affiliation>
				<Identifier Source="ORCID"></Identifier>
			</Author>
            			<Author>
                				<FirstName>Parameswari</FirstName>
				<LastName>Kalivel</LastName>
				<Affiliation>Department of Physical Sciences, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore-641114, Tamil Nadu, India.</Affiliation>
				<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-7714-0392</Identifier>
			</Author>
            		</AuthorList>
		<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
		<History>
			<PubDate PubStatus="received">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>11</Month>
				<Day>17</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</History>
		<Abstract>The synthetic dyes which are largely used in the textile industries pollute the total ecosystem. They can be treated using different technologies but in order to avoid secondary pollution and to carry out an eco-friendly technique, an electrocoagulation process has been adopted. In this work, two sets of electrodes which act as the electrocatalysts for the process of electrocoagulation, with one set containing aluminium as an anode and the other with copper as anode has been used to contrast and compare the removal efficacies. The colour removal efficiency was observed as 98.42% for Al-Cu, and 95.12% for Cu-Al electrodes. The COD and BOD removal efficiency was found to be 89.74%, 86.1% for Al-Cu and 87.15%, 85.23% for Cu-Al electrodes. The cost for the treatment process was 3.31 US$/m3 and 0.22 US$/m3 for Al-Cu and Cu-Al electrodes respectively. The sludge was subjected to EDX, SEM, and XPS analysis which showed the formation of hydroxides and dissolution of an anode implying copper as the best anode material. The energy and electrode consumption, operating cost was minimum for copper than aluminium. Due to high COD and BOD removal, the treated water can be reused for agriculture and for fish growth.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
            			<Object Type="keyword">
				<Param Name="value">BOD</Param>
			</Object>
						<Object Type="keyword">
				<Param Name="value">Catalytic activity</Param>
			</Object>
						<Object Type="keyword">
				<Param Name="value">COD reduction</Param>
			</Object>
						<Object Type="keyword">
				<Param Name="value">Dissimilar electrodes</Param>
			</Object>
						<Object Type="keyword">
				<Param Name="value">Textile effluent</Param>
			</Object>
					</ObjectList>
	</Article>
	</ArticleSet>
